Everything Wrong with media interviews and Debates

Everything Wrong with media interviews and Debates

I have seen how some of the media personnel curl themselves behind a camera like a chameleon then throw questions at interviewees , sometimes in a provoking way and when the interviewee accidentally says something wrong, it becomes the focus of the evening news, it is repeated more than ten times within an hour, “can you believe that, the YOGOS firm manager has just called foreign contractors JACKALS who suck your account dry without producing any results, do you know what the consequences of such a phrase would be, we will lose valuable investors which could hamper our city’s development, ” on and on they repeated the old man’s words creating a whole range of variations to it. 

But when you actually listen keenly to the interview you find that the firm director had said something quite different and what he meant was not really as it was portrayed. The man behind the camera had asked him about dogs and how they compare to their wild brothers the jackals, he in turn replied that jackals are worse than dogs because they are of no use to man the way dogs are, the askers voice was surprisingly lowered while that of the interviewee significantly raised to make it look like what was replied had no relations with what was asked. 

Some media persons can psychologically victimize and discourage their specimens for as long as they please without fear of a similar possible reverse action done against them. 

Somebody’s answering a non-existent possibly imaginary questions, they struggle to find answers to reply to while their mean interrogator enjoys a secure hideout behind a camera, they have an apparent feeling of complete absence yet still very influential in the present meeting.

Such cases are also evident when you see entire portions of a speech or conversation left out to focus on some small nasty segment that interested the reporter most. In such cases you can never fully comprehend what the entire conversation was all about or what was in the speakers mind when he spoke in a given way. “they stirred him with sole hurting words  then crawled back behind cameras to capture all his violent reactions on live television, when media personnel insults a prominent  figure then it’s okay, it’s called justice, but when the same is done otherwise, then its frowned upon as media oppression, persecution etc.”  

0 0 vote
Article Rating



...

advertisement

...






Subscribe
Notify of
guest
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Michael Cohen on Proud Boys: In Trump's mind, this is his army - CNN Video

CNN's Erin Burnett speaks with President Donald Trump's former attorney Michael Cohen about the President's remarks during the first 2020 presidential debate when he told right-wing extremist group the Proud Boys to "stand back and stand by."

CNN | 01 Oct, 2020
Heather Heyer's mother says she wasn't surprised Trump refused to condemn white supremacy

More than three years after her daughter, Heather Heyer, was killed in the Charlottesville rally, Susan Bro says she gasped when President Donald Trump refused to denounce white supremacy during the debate.

CNN | 01 Oct, 2020
Several New York zip codes are reporting infection rates five times higher than statewide rate

New York has reported several Covid-19 clusters that have created "hotspot" zip codes, the governor said, with a positivity rate about five times more than statewide.

CNN | 01 Oct, 2020
Analysis: Trump takes his antidemocratic campaign to the people

If you haven't yet read about how President Donald Trump bullied, badgered and interrupted his way through an excruciating 90-minute presidential debate Wednesday night, there's plenty of outrage to choose from.

CNN | 01 Oct, 2020
Analysis: Trump's latest punt on White supremacy shows a debate rebound will be tough

President Donald Trump's failure yet again to unequivocally condemn White supremacy Wednesday -- to clear up a chilling moment from his debate clash with Democratic nominee Joe Biden -- shows how he may find it impossible to reboot for their next crucial cont…

CNN | 01 Oct, 2020
Opinion: There's only one way to fix the presidential debates

Errol Louis writes that the fatal flaw in Tuesday's Trump-Biden debate was not giving the moderator, Chris Wallace, the power to compel the candidates to follow the rules they'd agreed to.

CNN | 01 Oct, 2020
Bob Woodward: We now have a constitutional problem - CNN Video

Legendary journalist Bob Woodward and CNN's Wolf Blitzer discuss the first presidential debate between President Donald Trump and Democratic nominee Joe Biden.

CNN | 01 Oct, 2020
Trump's debate callout bolsters far-right Proud Boys

Members of the far-right group the Proud Boys are celebrating comments made by President Donald Trump after he was asked ​to condemn White supremacists, and refused to do so, during Tuesday's presidential debate.

CNN | 01 Oct, 2020
Trump just couldn't say it. Still, he said so much.

President Donald Trump likes to make the false assertion that, perhaps save for Abraham Lincoln, "nobody has ever done for the Black community" what Trump has done. But what he said -- or rather, what he didn't say -- during the first 2020 presidential debate…

CNN | 30 Sep, 2020
Biden uses 'inshallah' in response to Trump during debate, lighting up Twitter

During one of the more charged moments of the chaotic US presidential debates, former Vice President Joe Biden dropped a phrase from everyday Muslim vocabulary and lit up the internet.

CNN | 30 Sep, 2020
Powered by NewsAPI.org